Some of these provisions are often overlooked by lawyers and parties on both sides, without considering the key role these issues could play in the outcome of the settlement. The attorney is expected to discuss each of these issues with clients before and during mediation: California Governor Gavin Newsom recently signed California Senate Bill 331 (SB-331) titled “Silenced No More Act.” SB-331 expands two of California`s existing laws regarding employee settlement agreements and non-disclosure agreements; in particular Section 1001 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Section 12964.5 of the Code of the Government of California. For employees with privacy concerns who want to protect themselves from the public`s attention, the No Further Silence Act does not touch the exception that allows applicants to preserve their privacy. Therefore, at the request of the applicant, a settlement agreement may always contain a provision that protects the applicant`s identity and any fact that could lead to the discovery of the applicant`s identity. Under the previous legislation, this exception does not apply if a government agency or official is a party to the settlement agreement. On October 28, 2021, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) released a final rule that could prompt many employers in the restaurant, hospitality, and service industries to reconsider and/or end their use of tip credits under the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Under the RSA, an employer who meets certain requirements can count a limited number of tips that its employees receive with tips as a credit for its federal minimum wage obligation – a practice called “tip credit.” • Add the express consent of the parties to make the agreement binding and enforceable; and while it is possible to cancel a settlement agreement by filing a claim for settlement relief under the excusable provisions of Article 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure relating to error, negligence or surprise, it is unlikely that “if there is no fraud or undue influence. (Folsom v. Butte County Association of Governments (1982) 32 Cal.3d 668, 677). This is due to California`s strong public policy to encourage voluntary settlements. (See e.B. Osumi v.
Sutton (2007) 151 Cal.App.4th 1355, 1359; Tower Acton Holdings, LLC v Los Angeles County Waterworks (2002) 105 Cal.App.4. 590, 602.) • Inclusion of a provision requiring cooperation between all parties in the implementation of the agreement. If the documents are to be signed at a later date, you should consider including a provision that allows the court to appoint a signatory if the party does not cooperate. • A no-fault provision stating that the agreement is not an admission of liability or fault is likely to be included in any compromised agreement. Prepare your client in advance to minimize their surprise and anger, which can lead to the failure of a fair settlement. • Identify who pays each party`s attorney`s fees. Settlement agreements that remain silent on costs and fees do not constitute cost accounting or a demand for attorneys` fees. (Folsom v. Butte County Assn.
of Governments (1982) 32 Cal.3d 668, 671.) Fees and costs can be a valuable lever. A settlement agreement must not prevent or restrict a person from disclosing factual information relating to any claim of harassment, discrimination or retaliation under FEHA, including claims based on race, sexual orientation, religion, colour, national origin, ancestry, disability, health status and age. This provision builds on SB 820 of 2018 (the “Self-Rights Against Non-Disclosure Act”), which prohibited settlement agreements from preventing individuals from disclosing factual information about sex-based allegations. • Inclusion in the written document (or a separate written agreement) that provides that the court remains competent to enforce the settlement agreement under Article 664.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure; and the applicability of settlement agreements is an important consideration for all of us. Whether you are an applicant, defence lawyer or mediator, our common goal is to reach a settlement that satisfies you and your clients. None of us like the idea of spending time, money and effort on reaching and drafting agreements on what we think are important settlement terms, only to realize later that key terms have been omitted or left uncertain. And we shudder at the thought that the settlement agreements we`ve drafted may not be enforceable when challenged, which can lead to loss of customers, loss of money, and malpractice lawsuits. If your agreement template is more than a few years old, you should check out other updates from recent years that we`ve been blogging about, including this article (on the initial prohibition of harassment complaints and the updated language of Civil Code 1542) and this article on provisions restricting reinstatement (also known as “no future employment”).
. . . .